Why the Best Art Conceals Effort

There are various famous Americanisms about “rolling up our sleeves,” “hard work paying off,” and “pulling ourselves up by our own bootstraps.”  Collectively, we admire effort. We praise students who study all night,  athletes who train through physical exhaustion, workers who sacrifice personal leisure for bottom-line productivity. With the advent of the modern world in the 19th century, effort has become moral currency, particularly when it is linked to final output. However, art as a subject follows an entirely different law. Unlike the theatrical realm of professional sports, where perspiration is regarded as the salient feature of victory, the highest artistic achievement is not the display of effort, but its full disappearance. We have art only when the hand that makes it nearly disappears from our vision.  This is not a new proposition; the phrase that ‘art is the concealment of effort’ is attributed to the late Charlie Chaplin in the earlier half of the last century. However, this paradox has been recognized across time and memory as it relates to all artistic mediums and practice. It is famously noted by Baldassare Castiglione, the 16th-century Italian diplomat, who coined the novel term ‘sprezzatura’ to describe the cultivated appearance of effortlessness. In the parlance of the contemporary world, it is sometimes referred to as a state of “studied carelessness,” or perhaps even a “skillful nonchalance.” Castiglione discusses this idea as the ability to perform something truly and uniquely masterful, as if it required no effortful strain whatsoever. The Renaissance courtier at the height of the Quattrocento was expected to be the proverbial jack-of-all-trades: dancing, speaking, writing poetry, and wielding a sword with such natural ease that the immense training behind these accomplishments never appeared. This was partially the intention of formal education, but this too directs that natural grace needs to be studied. Effort, if seen, spoiled the effect.

The same rule governs the whole realm of art. When we stand before a great painting, we do not think about the painter’s long hours mixing pigments, or sketching seemingly endless character studies, or endless corrections or retouches. We simply see the painting. When we hear a beautiful melody, we do not imagine the composer crossing out drafts late into the hours of the night. When we read a powerful book, the grammatical calculations and revisions that produced it have vanished. The editor’s heavy pen is unrealized because it is unseen. We experience only the finished form, not the struggle that made art possible. Consider the art of writing itself, the most basic unit of any literature. A great sentence often feels inevitable, perhaps even obvious, as though it could not have been written in any other way. Yet, writers know this feeling is almost always illusory, carefully constructing written ideas through editorial revision. Ernest Hemingway’s prose seems spare and natural, but the record of his manuscripts reveals a battlefield of heavy corrections frustrating the naturalism of his vision. Gustave Flaubert was forever searching for le mot juste, the precise word that would carry the weight of an idea. What appears effortless on the page is often the result of weeks or months of  immense labor. However, it is essential that the reader should never feel that labor directly. If the strain becomes visible, the artistic spell is broken. In this sense, art resembles hospitality. A good host hides all of the strained preparations that make the gathering of people possible. The guest experiences the natural warmth and social ease of the situation, not the hours spent cooking or the thoughtful arrangements of the room. Likewise, the artist prepares a world into which the viewer may enter without any unnecessary friction.

Why does art demand this kind of concealment? It is because art aims at an experience of form, rather than a token demonstration of work. The illustration of effort is irrelevant to art. What is more, the moment we become conscious of the artist’s effort, we step outside the work and begin thinking about the process behind it, about how it was done, and all of the technical elements that come along with it. Instead of inhabiting the world of the artwork, its imagery and meaning, we are reminded of the workshop, the process, the labor it took.  Modernity often reverses this principle. In an age fascinated by process, audiences are invited to watch the artist work. Culturally, we have become inundated with a barrage of studio tours, behind-the-scenes footage, social media posts, and in-depth documentaries, all claiming some otherwise unknown insight into every stage of creation. In the post-modern world, effort becomes part of the spectacle of the creator. While this transparency can be interesting, it subtly changes our relationship with art. The finished piece risks becoming secondary to the narrative of how it was made. The greatest works of art leave us with the strange impression that they simply are. They seem to stand before us with the inevitability of something natural, as if they had always existed and the artist has simply stumbled upon them or uncovered them for us. This illusion is not an act of dishonesty, at least not directly. It is the highest courtesy that the artist can offer to their audience. By concealing the cognitive strain, the revisions, and the countless discarded attempts, the artist allows us to encounter the work in its truest form, without the noise of the cluttered workshop echoing behind it. The magician who reveals his trick destroys the magic.

As a result of the age of technology that we live in, we have come to a place of  increasingly distrusting what appears effortless, in large part because we suspect something nefarious, some kind of manipulation, or more uniquely, artificial intelligence. We demand to see every rehearsal, every draft, every backstage moment to give the experience contextual credibility. Yet, the task of civilization itself depends upon countless forms of concealed professional mastery. The length of study to jurisprudence is intended to produce judges who deliberate without displaying any obvious uncertainty in their deliberations. The task of didactics and student-teaching has the intended end goal of creating educators whose formal preparations disappear behind fairly lucid explanations of their subject. Physicians and surgeons, devote years of professional discipline to a sharp mind and a steady hand, all appear before a patient as being calm and confident in their proficiency. Perhaps the greatest compliment we can truly pay to any skillful means is to say that it “looks easy.”

Print